If somebody knows he or she is still kill in prison, even when they have a life sentence, and sometimes this is the only way to stop them. Internal server error. It is also known as capital punishment, this That debate ultimately failed, since the judges ruled in favor of the death penalty. Got it.
Works Cited
The death penalty gives closure to the victims of families who have endured the tragedy that many of us fear the most. When someone Is executed who killed a family member, vengeance is a part of the emotions that everyone feels. Families of murder victims would get a sense of closure knowing the person who took the life of their loved one would not be afforded the same opportunity again. The void they had for so long would seem to be filled. When the perpetrator is finally put to death, It Is somewhat a personal revenge In my mind; most people Just want to see the person suffer like the victim did. Our Justice system always shows more sympathy for criminals rather than victims, when criminals on death row have more than likely committed many crimes, and should be put to death.
It also creates another form of crime deterrent. Televised executions actually deter crime even more because people often react more to what they see rather than what they Imagine. People fear nothing more than death. If somebody knows he or she Is risking death for committing a crime, he or she may think twice before doing so. It provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. Many prisoners still kill In prison, even when they have a life sentence, and sometimes this Is the only way to stop them. It makes the criminals understand they will be held accountable for their actions. We need ways to keep our prisons from coming overcrowded and endangering the officers who work there.
Just Imagine a criminal breaking Into your house and killing your whole family; would you want that person to live the rest of his or her life In Jail, getting free meals and having a roof over their head, is the death penalty effective argumentative essay a TV In their cell? I would rather that person be killed than living a long life off my hard earned money! The death penalty Is effective because It protects the rest of the community from criminals, It teaches people not to Involve themselves In crime, is the death penalty effective argumentative essay, and It gives Justice to the vellums.
Argument Essay: Is the Death Penalty Effective? By enfolded tragedy that many of us fear the most. When someone is executed who killed a family so long would seem to be filled. When the perpetrator is finally put to death, it is somewhat a personal revenge in my mind; most people Just want to see the person of crime deterrent. If somebody knows he or she is still kill in prison, even when they have a life sentence, and sometimes this is the only way to stop them. There is an overpopulation of prisoners in America, and many accountable for their actions. The death penalty is effective because it protects the rest of the community from criminals, it teaches people not to involve themselves in crime, and it gives Justice to the victims. This essay is the death penalty effective argumentative essay written by a fellow student.
You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report. Argument: Is the Death Penalty Effective?. Argument: Is the Death Penalty Effective? Accessed January 7, is the death penalty effective argumentative essay In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match. Home Social Issues Law Punishment Death Penalty. Academic anxiety? Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task, is the death penalty effective argumentative essay. Get your paper price experts online.
Death Penalty Persuasive. Death penalty attention getter. Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements? Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report Order custom paper Without paying upfront. Related Topics Life imprisonment Corporal punishment Mass Incarceration Mandatory sentencing Capital Punishment. Is the death penalty effective argumentative. Should the Death Death Penalty Be Legal? Incentives for Charitable Acts — Argument on an Argument. The Toulmin Argument and Rogerian Argument, is the death penalty effective argumentative essay. The Catholic Church and the death penalty.
Death Penalty Implementation. A Tougher Death Penalty Will Reduce Crime. Death Penalty Analysis. Hi, my name is Amy �� In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Get help with your paper. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible.
ancient greece essay
When someone is sentenced to death penalty and is executed the family members remain with revenge as part of the emotions that everyone feels in the family. Capital punishment is unfair Legitimate due process and basic justice both require that the judicial functions of trial and sentencing be led with fundamental fairness. Especially when it comes to irreversible sanction of the death penalty is involved. In death sentencing there are cases of racial biasing. I suggest that if it comes to judgment of criminals anyone deserve equal punishment just like anyone else. Discrimination is mostly against the poor in our society when making judgments.
Therefore death sentence is based under the offences committed hence the appropriate punishment is decided. It is unfair and unjust manner against people. The blacks are more likely to be executed than the whites particularly if the casualty is a white. Therefore since death penalty is not for everyone it should be eliminated in constitution. Capital punishment is waste of tax payers by reducing the number of citizens therefore it has no significance and has no public safety benefit. According to vast majority of law implementation they suggest that death penalty does not deter violent crime. It is noted that the states with has death penalty laws have the highest murder rates. Capital punishment is viewed as inhuman and anachronistic by the international community. In , the European council reported that the death penalty is something anachronism.
As a result most countries in Europe have abolished the penalty. England abolished tit in , Canada in and France in The united nation is also not for the idea it advocates that there should be measures to restrict the number of offenses in which the death penalty might be imposed. In the application of international law, statistics show that countries have abolished death penalty either by law or by practice ACLU, 1. United States has not abolished the same which compelled it to abstain from signing international agreements. This treaty on prohibits physical and psychological torture but not the death penalty. Capital punishment is popular than its alternatives. Though it is said that most Americans approve the punishment, a careful analysis of their attitudes reveal otherwise.
Most of the citizen propose life sentence without parole. In a survey carried out in the state of California in the year , voters were asked their opinion on the issue. The death penalty is expensive than incarceration. Though it is suggested that life sentence is expensive than death sentence, taking all the relevant cost of the two decision and comparing them, death sentence is indeed expensive. A first degree murder is expensive in terms of time and the legal expenses incurred. This will include the time spent by judges, prosecutors, attorneys, public defenders, court reporters all are paid by the taxpayers.
A study carried out in New York in the year showed that the cost of death sentence would cost twice that of life in prison. This is according to the New York state defender on capital loss. Similar findings have been proved in North Carolina, Maryland and California ACLU, 1. Capital punishment can be termed as unjustified retribution. It is insisted that death penalty is the only fair and just or suitable revenge for atrocious crime such as murder. Death penalty can be defended on narrowly revengeful stands only for the crimes that involve murder and not for any other crime such as rape, kidnapping, treason or drug trafficking. Execution is more than revenge for the murder crime. The justification being that a criminal be punished for the crime they commit with the same punishment.
However, this principle is only applied on murder criminal. If the principle was to hold, torturers should be tortured, rapist raped and all other criminals are treated and punished as per the crime they have punished ACLU, 1. The family of the victim of such punishment is the most affected and they often oppose the punishment due to the problem they succumbed to after the bereavement. In conclusion therefore, the death punishment does not cure crime. The issue of death penalty will continue to be a public debate. Though it is said capital punishment reduces crime, it is a harsh treatment that does not offer the offender a chance to reform.
It is an expensive exercise that leaves trauma to the family of the bereaved. Death penalty is indeed a brutal way of retribution and should be abolished. Williams, Mary E. Capital Punishment. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, Winters, Paul A. The Death Penalty: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, We accept sample papers from students via the submission form. If this essay belongs to you and you no longer want us to display it, you can put a claim on it and we will remove it. Just fill out the removal request form with all necessary details, such as page location and some verification of you being a true owner. Please note that we cannot guarantee that unsubstantiated claims will be satisfied.
Note: this sample is kindly provided by a student like you, use it only as a guidance. ID Subscribe to WowEssays Premium and get access to over 1 MILLION high-quality downloadable samples. GET ACCESS NOW. Password recovery email has been sent to email email. If somebody knows he or she Is risking death for committing a crime, he or she may think twice before doing so. It provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. Many prisoners still kill In prison, even when they have a life sentence, and sometimes this Is the only way to stop them.
It makes the criminals understand they will be held accountable for their actions. We need ways to keep our prisons from coming overcrowded and endangering the officers who work there. Just Imagine a criminal breaking Into your house and killing your whole family; would you want that person to live the rest of his or her life In Jail, getting free meals and having a roof over their head, and a TV In their cell? I would rather that person be killed than living a long life off my hard earned money! The death penalty Is effective because It protects the rest of the community from criminals, It teaches people not to Involve themselves In crime, and It gives Justice to the vellums.
Argument Essay: Is the Death Penalty Effective? By enfolded tragedy that many of us fear the most. When someone is executed who killed a family so long would seem to be filled. When the perpetrator is finally put to death, it is somewhat a personal revenge in my mind; most people Just want to see the person of crime deterrent. If somebody knows he or she is still kill in prison, even when they have a life sentence, and sometimes this is the only way to stop them. There is an overpopulation of prisoners in America, and many accountable for their actions. The death penalty is effective because it protects the rest of the community from criminals, it teaches people not to involve themselves in crime, and it gives Justice to the victims. This essay was written by a fellow student.
You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. As of , there were 53 countries that still have the death penalty in their legal system and there were an estimated executions in This essay acknowledges that there are a multitude of facets to consider regarding the effectiveness of the measure and will delve specifically into three factors which are deterrence, recidivism and retribution. Detrimental elements such as the risk of false convictions and a negative correlation between deterrence and murder rates will also be discussed. This paper on the death penalty will be mainly limited to the United States US and Singapore, due to their strong stances on the death penalty.
The US has a multitude of states in close proximity with differing views on the death penalty. Singapore will be examined for its globally renowned approach to drug related offences. The first argument for the death penalty is due to the deterrence that it provides to society. The National Institute of Justice n. defined deterrence as the lawbreaking inhibition effects from the risk of sentencing. The country of Singapore will be used as a case example for the effectiveness of the death penalty in terms of deterrence. The Singaporean government has taken a fixed attitude against abolishing capital punishment due to its deterrent effect, especially for drug related offences.
The effect is apparent in the low statistics relating to drug related offences in Singapore as compared to other nations. Teo explained how 0. Furthermore, the fear of the death penalty has caused a reduction in the number of drug abusers in Singapore from in to in This evidence suggests that threat of the death penalty has resulted in general adherence to the drug laws in Singapore and contributes to the effectiveness of the measure. Singaporeans are also generally supportive of the death penalty for drug related offences demonstrated by how The strong public support for the measure possibly reinforces the notion that citizens believe that the death penalty is a useful tool and contributes to the safety of the country.
The short time period between conviction and execution in Singapore has also contributed greatly to the deterrent effect as it is practically a guaranteed outcome once the trial is complete. It seems reasonable to conclude that the deterrent effect has a positive impact on certain societies in dissuading potential criminals from committing offences and can contribute to maintaining a low crime rate. However, opponents claim that there is a lack of correlation between deterrence and the death penalty and instead there is the existence of an inverse relationship. An example would be how certain states in the United States with the death penalty have higher rates of murder than states without it.
For example, Louisiana with the death penalty had a murder rate of 12 citizens per population compared to Illinois without the death penalty which had a murder rate of about 8 citizens per population. This evidence suggests that the existence of the death penalty may be causing more crimes instead of being an effective deterrent. This may seem persuasive at first, but it mainly applies to certain areas of the US. Tures refutes the inverse relationship by stating that 11 out of the 25 states with the lowest rates of murder in the United States have the death penalty.
Furthermore, the idea that there is no correlation might be due to the death penalty being infrequently utilised by countries and that often it takes a significant amount of time to be put in place. This somewhat diminishes the argument that no correlation can be drawn between the death penalty and a deterrent effect. A further example in support of deterrence would be in the s in the United States when there was a temporary embargo of the death penalty. This led to an instantaneous increase in the number of murders committed and subsequently a reduction in the number of murders directly after the ban was raised which showed that there was some merit to the death penalty discouraging criminals from committing offences. The second aspect for the death penalty would be recidivism.
An argument can be made that the availability of the death penalty for countries would be the most beneficial method in preventing criminals from committing any serious unlawful acts again. Muhlhausen elaborated on this by stating that some offences are so atrocious that death sentences should be available to remove the offender from society. This suggests that the death penalty unlike other punishments would decisively prevent further harm from being committed to society as the offenders would be removed from the equation. However, critics of the re-offending argument question this and argue that other forms of punishment are more effective in preventing offenders from committing crimes.
It can be acknowledged that the death penalty definitively removes the offender from society, but alternative methods can allow the offender to realise his mistakes before returning to society as a law-abiding citizen. This proposes that alternative sentences to the death penalty can be more effective in terms of positively influencing the wrongdoer into returning to civilised order. A further alternative to the death penalty would be life imprisonment which means the inmates would be held in prison for the remainder of their lives. This completely removes the possibility that the criminals would harm society again and prolongs the period that they must contemplate on their actions.
The argument, however, fails to consider that that other forms of punishment apart from the death penalty such as life imprisonment do not comprehensively protect the citizens of the country. The individual may not be able to cause harm to the public as he is in jail, but he has the potential to damage other prisoners or members of the prison staff. An example would be prisons in New York of the United States, which does not have the death penalty. In , it had cases of attacks on prison workers and cases of assault on prisoners which illustrates the futility of prison sentences as a means of preventing inmates from reoffending. This shows that other methods of punishment such as regulation after their sentencing had little effect on their choice concerning recidivism and further emphasizes the effectiveness of the death penalty.
The third aspect for comparison would be retribution. Retribution constitutes the degree to which the sentence is meant to be on the same level as the offence committed and it should be relatively close to the offence committed. Retribution in terms of the death penalty is fairly useful as it affords closure to the victims and parties affected by the actions of the wrongdoer especially in murder cases. Closure refers to the finalisation of a disturbing event for an individual. It has been argued that the death penalty allows victims and affected parties to get some measure of catharsis through the execution of the offender.
However, an argument can be made for the risk of the death penalty taking the life of innocent individuals through false trials BBC. Amnesty International n. further elaborated on this point by stating how inmates in the US have been sentenced to death since the s on false convictions. Von Drehle supported this by stating that almost four percent of all convictions are flawed. It can be said that as long as the justice system in countries are not infallible, the jeopardy of wrongfully convicting and executing innocents would remain in society.
No comments:
Post a Comment